9/11 – A Detailed Report for 2012……

11 Sep

Introduction……

For the anniversary of 9/11 I have compiled information from the various professional groups calling for a new, independent investigation into the world changing events of that day.  It is their opinion that the official narrative given in the 9/11 Commission Report is inaccurate, misleading and has many omissions……

The 9/11 Myth……

On 11 September 2001, 19 Hijackers, directed by Osama Bin Laden, took over 4 commercial airliners armed with box cutters and, while evading the multi-billion dollar air defence system (NORAD), hit 75% of their targets.  It concluded that World Trade Centre towers 1, 2 and 7 collapsed due to structural failure as a result of fires in a ‘pancake’ fashion, while the plane that hit the Pentagon vaporised upon impact, as did the plane that crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.  The 9/11 Commission Report found that there were no prior warnings for this act of terrorism, while multiple government failures prevented an adequate response……

A Theory for what Really Happened on 9/11

In the preceding months to 9/11, covert CIA operatives infiltrated, brought together the cell and planned an attack for 11 September 2001.  The radicalised Muslim fundamentalist were given the impression that they were behind the planning of  the attacks under the guidance of Osama Bin Laden – via the CIA.  Believing that they had planned the attacks themselves under the control of Osama Bin Laden, were given all of the facilities and intelligence by their CIA handlers.  The 19 hijackers boarded the flights as arranged and were under the belief that their plan was running smoothly.  Having taken ‘control’ of the aircraft they carried out their mission successfully.  In reality they were ‘patsies’ and probably never flew the planes to their intended targets, with the aircraft being flown by remote control from the ground.

Professional Opinions……

There are many professionals from various disciplines who have expressed concerns based on their own detailed knowledge of construction, physics, controlled demolition, flight and includes eye-witness statements which seem to contradict the official narrative.  Below are details of some of these organisations together with their key findings……

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth……

Founded in 2006 by Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects with over 20 years experience designing steel framed skyscrapers, A&E for 9/11 Truth have over 1600 signatories who are all of the opinion that the collapse of WTC buildings 1, 2 & 7 could have only happened by controlled demolition and that the official ‘pancake’ theory is highly improbable.

Cut Column at the WTC

One of the main areas of concern to A&E for 9/11 Truth is the collapse of WTC building 7 which happened at 5.20pm on the afternoon of 9/11.  There are a great deal of people who are not even aware that a third building collapsed on that day.  Building 7 was not hit by an aircraft and suffered only superficial damage as a result of the collapse of WTC buildings 1 & 2, the twin towers.  It had small fires on a few floors which, in the official version of events, caused the structural steel to be sufficiently weakened to initiate the global collapse of the 47 story building.  Upon viewing of the footage, WTC 7 collapses uniformly in around 6 seconds, the length of time it would take a billiard ball to fall to earth if dropped from the same height and encountering only air resistance.  The collapse of building 7 appears to have been initiated at the lower levels.

To achieve controlled demolition the underlying steel support framework has be simultaneously cut.  Thereby removing

Setting a Cutter Charge

the structural support for the building above and leading to the classic controlled implosion you may have seen in the destruction of other redundant buildings.  What does the 9/11 Commission Report have to say about the collapse of WTC 7?  It says nothing.  Not even an acknowledgement that it had in deed collapsed.

Richard Gage applied the scientific method to investigate the collapse of WTC 7.  His presentation can be found at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2899586663939158659 and is a must see.

The World Trade Centre buildings are to this day the only steel framed skyscrapers to have collapsed as the result of fires.  There have been many examples of fires in high rise buildings; here are three:

Windsor Tower Ablaze

On 12 February 2005, the WindsorTower in Madrid, a 32 story skyscraper, burned for 24 hours

Windsor Tower – Still Standing

over almost all floors.  Although badly damaged, it did not collapse and was later demolished.

On 4 May 1988, the First Interstate Bank in Los Angeles, a 62 story skyscraper, burnt for 3.5 hours on floors 12 to 16.  It did not collapse and was subsequently repaired.

First Interstate Bank

On 9 February 2009, the Beijing Mandarin Oriental Hotel, a 44 story skyscraper, burnt for 6 hours across almost all

Mandarin Hotel

floors.  It too did not collapse……

Science – The Opinions of the Physicists……

Among the leading Physicists who question the official story is Professor Steven E. Jones Ph. D, of BrighamYoungUniversity.  Steven Jones was a founding member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.

Much of Steven Jones’s work has been undertaken on samples of the dust which covered much of Manhattan after the collapse of WTC buildings 1 & 2.  They show the tell tale signature of an explosive called Thermite and its military counterpart, Thermate.  Some of the scientific research carried out by Professor Jones and his colleagues can get quite complicated, so I have tried to simplify his findings:

The dust samples contain nano-spheres (small spherical objects).  Nano-spheres are created when a molten metal solidifies in air under the influence of gravity, in much the same way that the water droplets in rain form spheres.  The spheres, consisting mostly of iron, must therefore have formed from molten steel.  Steel melts at approximately 2600 – 2800 degrees Fahrenheit.  Jet fuel burns at approximately 1800 degrees Fahrenheit.  Therefore the nano-spheres found in the dust samples from 9/11 cannot have been created as the result of the heat generated in a jet fuel fire.  Furthermore, they contain elements which are not present in structural steel such as Sodium, Barium and Aluminium, but are commonly used as accelerants in Thermite and Thermate.

Professor Jones also puts forward the use of exothermic reactions to explain the molten metal found in the rubble of the TwinTowers up to 6 weeks after the collapse.  He explains that such reactions continue, even in an oxygen deprived environment, when not all of the ingredients used in the explosives are consumed during the initial event.  The same molten metal was reported under WTC building 7……

Pilots……

Pilots for 9/11 Truth, consist of some of the most highly qualified civilian and military pilots.  In the official 9/11 Commission Report they confirm that some of the 19 hijackers were trained in the United States.  However, a spokesman for Hoffman Aviation, where two of the pilots trained, stated that they were incompetent, terrible pilots who could barely control a single engine Cessna, only 10 days before 9/11.  On 9/11 one of the pilots performed a 330 degree turn,

AA77 Flight Path

losing 2200 feet in altitude at 530mph, crashing into the side of the Pentagon without even skimming the ground despite having hit 5 light poles en route.  This has been described by professional pilots as ‘virtually impossible’ even for a highly trained pilot and beyond the operating limits of the aircraft.  A look at the flight path shows that the ‘pilot’ could have plunged directly into the Pentagon or the White House without the need for such a complex manoeuvre.  Air Traffic Controllers report that, having seen the incoming aircraft on radar and due to its manoeuvre, it was their belief that it was a military plane sent to intercept American Airlines flight 77……

Eye Witness Testimony……

Despite the scientific evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the events of 11 September 2001 cannot have happened in the way in which we have been led to believe, the testimony of eye witnesses should not be dismissed as unreliable.  For example; Willy Rodriguez, a maintenance engineer who worked at the World Trade Centre for 20 years and was decorated for his bravery, risking his own life to save 15 others, has now joined the many who question the official narrative.  On 9/11 at approximately 8.46am, Willy was in the sub-basement level 1, when he describes hearing a huge explosion which knocked him off his feet.  This explosion came from below in one of the lower sub-basement levels.  Seconds later he recalls hearing an almighty bang from many floors above as American Airlines flight 11 crashed into the north tower.  On almost all the live news broadcasts from the scene, reporters and members of the public report hearing multiple explosions, which can be verified by the multitude of media recordings made on that day, but which have rarely been shown again in mainstream media broadcasts……

Anomalies, Contradictions & Lies……

On two occasions President George W. Bush claims to have watched American Airlines Flight 11 hit the north tower of the WTC on live TV.  However, the only piece of footage of Flight 11 in existence was taken by French documentary film makers Jules and Gedeon Naudet, who were filming with the New York Fire Department when they caught the event on camera by chance.  This footage was not made available to the world’s media until several hours afterwards.  Therefore, it is not possible for Bush to have watched it on ‘live’ TV.  Perhaps the President was mistaken about the timing but as he stated this happened whilst he was waiting to enter the classroom in which he was filmed during the attacks; he is clearly lying.

In the immediate aftermath, Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheyney, George Bush and others repeatedly stated that there were no prior warnings.  This was later to have been proven a lie when numerous foreign governments advised that they had given specific warnings.

Doubts also remain over the authenticity of the calls made by passengers on the hijacked aircraft.  For technical reasons, due to distance and speed, making a connection through the wireless networks to ground based antenna is almost impossible and, who calls their mother and gives their first and last names?  Examination of the transcripts of the calls made from the hijacked aircraft are worth contemplating.  They contain some strange statements, when one bears in mind that they were made during a hijack situation, such as ‘You do believe me, don’t you?’  They also contain some specific details which, although relevant, do not seem to be the kind of things a person who was in fear for their life would make……

In the aftermath of 9/11 the deception continued with devastating consequences for the people of New York……

Protocol……

Ground Zero was technically a crime scene and as such should have been, first and foremost, under the jurist diction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).  Second only to the FBI, Ground Zero and the surrounding area was the responsibility of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), whose remit covered any potential threat from a chemical or biological component of the attack and/or, any threat from contamination resulting from the complete destruction of the TwinTowers.  In charge of the EPA at that time was Christine Todd-Whitman……

“Good news” – (Christine Todd-Whitman – 13 September 2001)……

Christine Todd-Whitman made a statement reassuring the public in New York that the air was “safe to breathe”, “causes no concern” and “poses no significant health risk”. This statement was made 48 hours after the event.  However, she failed to mention that all press releases were being vetted by the National Security Council who systematically removed any cautionary notes and reworded negative statements.  At this time the EPA had reportedly tested only 10 samples of dust from New York City……

“No Cause for Concern?…..

Although it is impossible to give a completely accurate picture of the contaminants dispersed by the collapse of the WTC, the following data will give you some idea of the sorts of chemical compounds which are known to be a threat to human health:

  • 400 tons of Asbestos
  • 200,000 pounds of Cadmium & Lead
  • 90,000 litres of  Benzene
  • 2,000,000 pounds of Polycystic Hydrocarbons
  • 130,000 gallons of PCB’s
  • 420,000 tons of Crystalline Silica
  • 500,000 light bulbs containing Mercury

How the EPA was able to state that the air was “safe to breathe” and “causes no concern” on 13 September 2001 is not clear……

Business as Usual……

On 17 September 2001 the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) was re-opened without the air conditioning systems being tested or decontaminated, having only been cleaned with Vacuum Cleaners and Dusters.  Again, the residents and employees of Lower Manhattan were reassured by the EPA that it was safe to return to the area.  The only building which was decontaminated using standard procedure was the New York headquarters of the EPA.  Meanwhile, the fires underneath the ‘pile’ continued to burn, with fires documented for months afterwards during the clean up operation……

On subsequent visits to the site, the employees of the EPA can be seen wearing protective body suits and respirators.  The teams who worked at the site for months were given no such protection, being issued only with paper masks.  They were not given any Health and Safety briefings to warn of potential airborne hazards……

WTC Screening Program……

In August 2002 a screening program was put in place at the Mount SinaiHospital to monitor the population for health conditions consistent with those caused by the chemical soup from the TwinTowers.  They have seen 12,000 patients and recorded 8,100 cases of respiratory, pulmonary and renal disease.  Although disputed by the American Government, the death toll from these cases now outnumbers that of 9/11……

Conspiracy Theories……

It is easy for the American Government to dismiss alternative explanations of the events as ‘conspiracy theories’ but the facts remain; if there are in excess of 80 CCTV recordings of the plane that struck the Pentagon, why did the FBI and CIA feel the need to confiscate all of them and why, to this day, have only 5 frames of inconclusive footage been released to the public, which give no clarification of an incoming aircraft.  Despite numerous Freedom of Information requests to view the remaining 99% of recordings have been made, all have been deigned?

 

‘9/11 was a false flag operation orchestrated by factions within the American Government to give further impetus to the advancement of the military industrial complex and world domination by the controlling elite’

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: